Public Space, Greenery, Gentrification

We all know this: gentrification is a complex urban phenomenon. It is difficult to contain, and even harder to resolve once it begins. Yet when we discuss anti-gentrification policies and strategies, there is often an expectation that a single intervention — one “silver bullet” — could solve the problem.

That will never be possible. And perhaps it is good that way, since cities are living systems that require nuanced and evolving approaches. However, if we want to move toward deductive, structured solutions, there is a pattern we can propose — a strategic framework for addressing gentrification in cities.

The Dilemma of Public Space and Greenery
It is often remarked that improving public space or introducing more greenery leads to rising real estate prices in nearby areas. Frequently, this is true.

The paradox is that vulnerable neighborhoods — which are most in need of better public space and environmental quality — are also the most exposed to gentrification pressures once these improvements are made. Thus, by attempting to improve their living conditions, we inadvertently increase the risk of displacement.

This tension is real. But rather than abandoning improvement projects, we can design preventive strategies.

A Framework for Anti-Gentrification Strategies

In highly capitalized societies, where taxation is tied to property values and private commercial housing dominates the housing stock, every improvement in public space risks driving up costs. On top of this, market dynamics can further accelerate or reduce value in unpredictable ways.

Given this, two main strategies emerge:

Gradual, Ongoing Maintenance
Municipalities should focus on continuous, incremental improvements and maintenance of public space. This way, property price increases can be absorbed within annual inflation rates, preventing sharp spikes that accelerate gentrification.

Balancing Large-Scale Improvements with Housing and Amenities
When masterplans propose significant urban greenery or major public space investments, they should always be paired with proportional increases in housing supply — ideally including affordable and mixed-income units.

In addition, projects should be supported by public amenities that reinforce community centrality and resilience: hospitals, recreation centers, retirement facilities, flea markets, small-scale production zones, and community centers. These ensure that development benefits existing residents rather than only attracting new, wealthier populations.